|
I.
Jigsaw Readings
Author: Tom Siebold is a writer and
business consultant in
Minneapolis. He is also co-owner of Collegegrazing.com--a site to help college bound teens to learn more about what they need
and want in a college.
Objective (s): To
quickly get an overview of the literature on a topic and to initiate a
discussion from diverse points of view
How
the author has used this activity: This activity format can be
used with almost any professional development topic. However, it
does require some pre-workshop preparation since the facilitator will have
to find provocative readings on the workshop topic. Much of the success of
this activity depends on the quality of the readings.
Activity Description: Divide the full group into small
discussion groups. Each small
group receives a short reading (all should be of equal length and
each reading should emphasize a different aspect of the topic).
A volunteer in each group reads the reading aloud.
Then each group discusses the key points made by the author.
After a set amount of discussion time, each group writes a
discussion question to be addressed by the full group (make certain that
the question is discussable).
Convene the full group.
The discussion questions are written on a flip chart or white
board. In turn, a selected
person from each group leads the discussion on the group’s question.
After an adequate amount of discussion time the facilitator asks
each discussion leader to explain how his or her group responded to the
question. (See Options below for another way to structure this
activity.)
With this exercise participants
can quickly get a multidimensional view of what the professionals are
saying about the topic. At its conclusion, the facilitator can use the
discussions as a springboard to his or her own material on the topic.
Options: An option to save time is to
have one person from each group use his or her discussion question to
facilitate a discussion station. The small group questions
are read to the full group and then participants move to a discussion
station that interests them. This cuts down discussion time.
Participants then engage with two readings--one in their original group
and another at the discussion station that they attend. Although
it requires a lot of equipment and preparation, facilitators can replace
the readings with training video clips.
Added thoughts or considerations: Timing is really important
here. The facilitator needs to cut discussion time before it draws
out too long but not cut it so early that the discussions fail to
mature.
--Return
to Top--
II.
Rotation
Brainstorming
Author: Tom Siebold is a writer and
business consultant in
Minneapolis. He is also co-owner of Collegegrazing.com--a site to help college bound teens to learn more about what they need
and want in a college.
Objective (s): To
secure a working understanding of engagement (or another topic of your
choice)
How
the author has used this activity: This activity format can be
used with many professional development topics. I like this activity
because it encourages people to participate, it is fast moving, and it gets
the participants out of their chairs. I use the activity to
"paint" an overview of the workshop topic.
Activity Description: List three to five broad
questions or statements about engagement (or whatever your topic is).
For an introduction to engagement, here are some possible
questions: What are the
indicators that a team or group in NOT engaged?
What causes a person to disengage? Why is it important to work
diligently to keep individuals or a team engaged?
What are some strategies or “tricks” that you use to stay
engaged? What are some behaviors or strategies that a leader can use to
help keep his or her team engaged? Why
is an engaged workforce vital to the success of an organization?
Place a flip chart for each
question strategically around the workshop room (allow enough space for
movement and small group discussion).
Divide the participants into small groups, one for each question, and
place them at the different flip chart stations.
Each group responds to the question by writing down three of their
best ideas. At the signal of the facilitator (blink the lights), groups
rotate to the next station and add three more key points to the previous
group.
After groups rotate through all
the stations, they end up where they started.
Here they review all the responses and identify the three to five
best responses. The facilitator
then asks each group to present their conclusions to the full group.
The facilitator can use this information to focus on key learning
strategies and content.
Added thoughts or considerations: Timing is really important
here. The facilitator needs to keep things moving from flip chart to
flip chart. It is also vital that the facilitator select station
questions that are discussable and lend themselves to a variety of
responses.
--Return
to Top--
III. Idea
Challenge
Author: Tom Siebold is a writer and
business consultant in
Minneapolis. He is also co-owner of Collegegrazing.com--a site to help college bound teens to learn more about what they need
and want in a college.
Objective (s): To
understand a challenging professional idea by defending it.
How
the author has used this activity: This activity asks
participants to talk directly to one another. It gives them an
opportunity to structure an argument for or against a thought provoking
topic. I especially like this format because the participants talk
directly to one another rather than through the facilitator.
Activity Description:
With this activity participants
hear a provocative statement and then decide if they want to work with
others to support the statement or challenge it.
The facilitator reads a provocative statement, defines terms if
necessary, and clarifies the scope of the discussion.
Participants then move to two different preparation areas.
One group builds a case in support of the statement and the other
questions it. Participants
clarify what the statement means to them and offer support and examples
either for or against it.
After a set amount of preparation
time, the two sides present their case and
challenge the opposing point of view.
The facilitator must closely monitor the way the discussion unfolds
so each side has equal time. After
the “debate” participants physically change sides if they have changed
their minds.
Although
this will work with many different topics, I have included a few
"debate" statements
that focus on organizational culture and motivation:
-
The
major determining factor in an employee’s effectiveness is the culture
of the organization
-
Organizations
work better if they view themselves as communities rather than
institutions
-
The
key factor in employee morale is the
nature of relationships that
employees have at work
-
Essentially,
change is an act of will
-
People
are only motivated when they are engaged in the process of knowledge
building
-
The
driving
force behind morale is whether an individual feels valued or not
-
The
organization’s culture shapes how an individual thinks and acts
Options: One option is to have the
two groups select a spokesperson to represent each group.
Added thoughts or considerations: I think it is wise not to
use this too early in a workshop, wait until the participants are feeling
comfortable with each other. In a full day workshop, I like to save
this for the afternoon session because the lively debate tends to perk
people up. Be careful not to overuse this format.
--Return
to Top--
IV.
Posted Professionalism
Author: Tom Siebold is a writer and
business consultant in
Minneapolis. He is also co-owner of Collegegrazing.com--a site to help college bound teens to learn more about what they need
and want in a college.
Objective (s): To
have participants summarize their thoughts on different aspects of a topic
How
the author has used this activity: I like to use this activity
to create a doorway to more detailed information. It also is a good way to
collect the thoughts of the entire group and synthesize their collective
thinking.
Activity Description:
In
this activity participants react to three professionalism statements by
jotting down short responses on sticky notes.
Note that this format will work with a variety of topics—simply
write statements that support the topic.
The facilitator sets aside three wall spaces for the notes to be
posted—one area for each statement.
After
the notes are posted, participants are divided into three teams, one for
each grouping. Each team
then combines, synthesizes, rearranges, and/or groups their notes.
It is each team’s job to draw three to five conclusions based on
the notes. At the
facilitator’s signal, each team reports their conclusions.
Below
are three statements that I have used in a climate workshop:
-
As
a professional, I expect to be treated in the following manner at work.
-
As
a professional, I feel the following values should drive the work site.
-
The
following words or statements describe my ideal work climate.
Options: To save time you can give
the group a few minutes to roam around the room reading the different
notes. Then with the full group reconvened you can ask them to draw
generalizations from the posted information.
Added thoughts or considerations: I like to use this activity
as a spring board to my own presentation material. I make an effort
to refer to the conclusions throughout the workshop so that the
participants understand that it was an activity with meaning.
--Return
to Top--
V. Metaphorically
Speaking
Author: Tom Siebold is a writer and
business consultant in
Minneapolis. He is also co-owner of Collegegrazing.com--a site to help college bound teens to learn more about what they need
and want in a college.
Objective (s): To
tap the creative side of the group to see a topic in a new way
How
the author has used this activity: Sometimes workshops feel like
a regimented linear march. I like to break up the rhythm of a workshop
by asking the participants to think differently about their professionalism.
Activity Description:
Sometimes creating a metaphor can
help trigger insights. In this
activity the participants, working in pairs, discuss metaphors provided by
the facilitator and relate them to their work situation or organization.
In
addition each pair creates one or two metaphors to add to the list.
Each pair is given an opportunity to explain one of their metaphors
to the full group.
Of
course the metaphors will focus on the topic of the workshop or training
session. This is a very
adaptable exercise. Below are
five metaphors that I used with a group of middle school teachers:
-
Teaching is like building a
pyramid.
-
A school is like an
ocean-going ship
-
Teachers are artists
-
Students are like bumper
cars
-
Education is a mosaic
Options: I have used this activity
as a pre--workshop assignment. Participants read their metaphors at
the outset. It can be an enjoyable way to begin.
Added thoughts or considerations: Keep in mind that some
people may find that this exercise takes them out of their comfort
zone. Be prepared to offer suggestions. I also like to use
this exercise as a "rapid fire" activity.
--Return
to Top-- VI.
Gorilla Tale
Author: Tom Siebold is a writer and
business consultant in
Minneapolis. He is also co-owner of Collegegrazing.com--a site to help college bound teens to learn more about what they need
and want in a college.
Objective (s): To
introduce the need to stay open to change
How
the author has used this activity: I like to use this activity
to discuss the power of unseen forces in organizations.
Activity Description:
Don’t
neglect the power that parables, metaphors, and analogies have to make a
point. In this activity, a
short story entitled The Gorilla
Story is used to emphasize how the status quo frequently keeps
organizations from making change or approaching things differently.
I
usually ask a volunteer to read the story out loud to the full group.
Here is the story…
The
Gorilla Story
This
story starts with a cage containing five gorillas and a large bunch of
bananas hanging above some stairs in the center of the cage. Before long,
a gorilla goes to the stairs and starts to climb toward the bananas. As
soon as he touches the stairs, all the gorillas are sprayed with cold
water. After a while, another gorilla makes an attempt and gets the same
result—all the gorillas are sprayed with cold water.
Every time a gorilla attempts to retrieve the bananas, the others
are sprayed. Eventually, they quit trying and leave the bananas alone.
One
of the original gorillas is removed from the cage and replaced with a new
one. The new gorilla sees the bananas and starts to climb the stairs. To
his horror, all the other gorillas attack him. After another attempt and
attack, he knows that if he tries to climb the stairs he will be
assaulted. Next, the second of the original five gorillas is replaced with
a new one. The newcomer goes to the stairs and is attacked. The previous
newcomer takes part in the punishment with enthusiasm.
Next
the third original gorilla is replaced with a new one. The new one goes
for the stairs and is attacked as well. Two of the four gorillas that beat
him have no idea why they were not permitted to climb the stairs or why
they are participating in the beating of the newest gorilla.
After
the fourth and fifth original gorillas have been replaced, all the
gorillas that were sprayed with cold water are gone. Nevertheless, no
gorilla will ever again approach the stairs. Why not?
“Because
that’s the way it has always been done.”
After the reading, I simply ask
the group to discuss the lesson of the story by applying it to situations
that they have encountered in their organizations.
Here are some other questions that have generated related
discussion: Why is change so threatening?
What is the power of the status quo?
How can a leader help break “gorilla” thinking? What motivates
people to move out of their comfort zones?
In organizations, how is the status quo perpetuated?
Why do people react so defensively to proposed changes?
Options:
If you have the right group, you can ask them to break into small groups
or pairs and write their own illustrative story. It is great fun to
have the participants read their stories to the full group.
Added thoughts or considerations: Be careful not to overuse
this kind of activity. For some participants too much of this style
of learning feels unproductive.
--Return
to Top--
VII.
Positive
Transformation
Author: Tom Siebold is a writer and
business consultant in
Minneapolis. He is also co-owner of Collegegrazing.com--a site to help college bound teens to learn more about what they need
and want in a college.
Objective (s): To
introduce the power of positive thinking
How
the author has used this activity: When confronted with a challenge
or issue people frequently frame their thinking in negative terms.
This exercise asks participants to transform negative statements
into positive ones.
Activity Description:
Ask participants to identify
commonly heard negative comments. These
may be general in nature or focused on a particular topic.
Write these on the board so everyone can see.
Divide the group into pairs or small groups and have them transform
the negative statements into positive assertions.
Have them share their work.
Example: The negative mindset…
“We’ll never trust each other enough to have productive team
meetings” is
transformed into a more positive assertion…“As we increase our trust
level our team meetings will be proportionally productive.”
This is a good activity to set up
discussions about organizational culture and the power of positive
self-talk.
Options:
You may want to use negative comments that you have prepared before
the workshop.
Added thoughts or considerations: If I plan to use this
activity, I like to interview a sampling participants before a workshop to
gather a few good examples that the group can relate to.
--Return
to Top--
VIII.
Communication Habits
Author: Tom Siebold is a writer and
business consultant in
Minneapolis. He is also co-owner of Collegegrazing.com--a site to help college bound teens to learn more about what they need
and want in a college.
Objective (s): To
identify the habits of good communicators.
How
the author has used this activity: Any
investigation of good workplace communication should begin with some type
of communication profile.
Activity Description:
In this activity pairs or small
groups explore eight dimensions of communication by listing both bad and
good habits for each. Have the
participants define and discuss each of the communication practices and
then complete the chart below. After
the participants have completed the chart, ask them to make a list of the
key habits of excellent communicators.
|
Communication
Practice
|
Bad
Habits
|
Good
Habits
|
|
1.
Listening
|
|
|
|
2.
Reading
people
|
|
|
|
3.
Delivery
style or attitude
|
|
|
|
4.
Paying
attention
|
|
|
|
5.
Asking
questions
|
|
|
|
6.
Message
responsibility
|
|
|
|
7.
Message
clarity
|
|
|
|
8.
Adjusting
the message to the audience or situation
|
|
|
Options:
If you have a group that likes to role play, you can set up a dandy
scenarios portraying bad communicators.
Added thoughts or considerations: To make this activity work,
spend some time defining the communication practices before you ask
participants to work on their own.
--Return
to Top--
|